Re:Another free CA as an alternative to Let's Encrypt
by kro on Friday August 20, 2021 @10:10AM
(#28246184)
What I've done is delegate (NS record) only the subdomain _acme-challenge to a standalone DNS-zone the webserver has write access to.
This way it cannot escalate to changing root A/MX.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Another free CA as an alternative to Let's Encrypt
by remram on Friday August 20, 2021 @12:14PM
(#28247729)
Oh that is really smart. Is there a way to build a simple DNS server into a certbot (or other client) plugin? That DNS server doesn't really have to be available outside of the verification time window.
DNS validation has been a thorn in my side for a while. Not only do I use DNS hosts that don't have APIs (like Google Domains), I also don't really want to give every web server access to my entire zone. That seems like a huge attack surface.
Re:Another free CA as an alternative to Let's Encrypt
by kro on Friday August 20, 2021 @02:02PM
(#28249308)
I already had Bind on the machine so it was logical to add the zone there and utilize nsupdate : https://gist.github.com/kronthto/893715f12cc0b1cda9fcfdbd8dc...
But what you are suggesting should work just fine aswell - there should be no need for a persistent service. Of course the service would need to run on port 53, so you actually cannot have another nameserver on that machine already, and also require CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE .
A quick search lead me to this python project that could be an inspiration: https://github.com/pawitp/acme-dns-server
Re:Another free CA as an alternative to Let's Encrypt
by snowzach on Friday August 20, 2021 @05:53PM
(#28251837)
I run this one: https://github.com/joohoi/acme-dns
It's super simple and has a REST API for updating records.
Re:Another free CA as an alternative to Let's Encrypt
by tommiegannert on Friday August 20, 2021 @10:42AM
(#28246604)
Me too, but I enabled nsupdate on that zone, while I wanted to keep my first-level domain safe.