ImageNet contains naturally occurring Apple NeuralHash collisions

Re:ImageNet contains naturally occurring Apple NeuralHash co... by bawolff on Thursday August 19, 2021 @01:12PM (#28236497)

In a proposed system that has yet to be deployed?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ImageNet contains naturally occurring Apple NeuralHash co... by endisneigh on Thursday August 19, 2021 @01:14PM (#28236519)

This has already existed in PhotoDNA since 2008. This is not new

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ImageNet contains naturally occurring Apple NeuralHash co... by bawolff on Thursday August 19, 2021 @03:47PM (#28238442)

But that's deployed in a very different way which makes the concerns being discussed much less likely to happen.

Specificly the person doing the scanning already has access to photos and can double check the results without having to sieze the device, a rather public process.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ImageNet contains naturally occurring Apple NeuralHash co... by toby- on Thursday August 19, 2021 @03:28PM (#28238222)

Examples of on-device scanning via PhotoDNA?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ImageNet contains naturally occurring Apple NeuralHash co... by robertoandred on Thursday August 19, 2021 @03:48PM (#28238465)

People’s photo libraries are scanned. The result is the same.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ImageNet contains naturally occurring Apple NeuralHash co... by minitoar on Friday August 20, 2021 @10:42AM (#28246593)

Only if you’re putting your stuff in the cloud. There’s a big difference between my files on my computer and my files on someone else’s computer. Or at least there should be, IMO.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ImageNet contains naturally occurring Apple NeuralHash co... by robertoandred on Friday August 20, 2021 @11:30AM (#28247175)

Yeah, only if you're putting your stuff in the cloud. The result is the same.

[ Parent | on HN ]