News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Economic costs of war by Grakel on Monday August 16, 2021 @07:44PM (#28204314)
There's probably more metal in the solar system than the volume of Earth.
Re:Economic costs of war by kortex on Monday August 16, 2021 @08:11PM (#28204556)
Ah yes, technical truth, the best kind of truth.

There could be asteroids of pure palladium, platinum, gold, and silver, and it wouldn't matter a fig until it was cost competitive with digging rocks out of the ground, sticking them on a slow barge to a massive refinery and processing them with cheap, probably exploitative, labor.

Re:Economic costs of war by yunohn on Monday August 16, 2021 @07:50PM (#28204376)
I guess this kind of retort would help you in a pub quiz.
Re:Economic costs of war by Grakel on Monday August 16, 2021 @07:59PM (#28204458)
There's no shortage of metal, that's the point. Open your mind.
Re:Economic costs of war by stevenhuang on Monday August 16, 2021 @08:50PM (#28204821)
There is an effective shortage of resources since the capacity to mine for them is not infinite, and production cannot meet demands.
Re:Economic costs of war by AnimalMuppet on Monday August 16, 2021 @10:57PM (#28205681)
And the metal in space doesn't help us with our current technology. Obviously.

"We can't have a metal shortage because there's lots of metal in space" is not the most coherent argument I've heard today...

Re:Economic costs of war by Grakel on Tuesday August 17, 2021 @08:56AM (#28209324)
What I originally said was there's no metal shortage, only the price of metal. We'll be mining the solar system long before we run out of metal on earth. For aluminum, for instance, there's an insane amount in the Earth's crust.
Re:Economic costs of war by stevenhuang on Tuesday August 17, 2021 @07:59PM (#28216192)
Supply and demand informs price. Not the other way around. That's why your argument makes no sense.