Plus reading here about certain companies' interest in pruning people ruthlessly...
I could see why morale among new hires would be problematic in this rather chaotic time.
That's all done in chat now. Which on a personal level, that's how I've done it for a quarter of a century, but it's like that at work now too.
Additionally, someone who's new is much easier to spot and thus be reminded of when they're physically proximate. Someone new on chat who doesn't have much to contribute yet can very easily vanish, so while they may be able to pull information from others, much less information will be deliberately pushed their way.
I'm not saying it's impossible, but we have millennia of culture and evolution built around in-person interactions.
I haven't seen that. What type of conversations that used to be public are you seeing being moved to private now that things are done through chat?
So if today's new grads are telling you "I'm drowning" and two years ago they weren't... maybe you should listen.
And measured productivity is only half of it if a sizable fraction of those frustrated new grads leave much sooner than they would otherwise.
Or if "new grad" experiences also tend to match "new hire" experiences even for experienced folks...
The whole reason FANG companies hire new grades is because a small fraction will become superstars in a few years. And a small handful of those superstars will stay out of loyalty/comfort/inertia. New grads are basically deep out of the money, long-dated call options. Companies aren't going to care whether it takes them 3 months or 6 months to get acclimated to the org's culture.