Re:Past Performance is Not Indicative of Future Results (2020)
by coddle-hark on Saturday July 31, 2021 @01:04PM
(#28019842)
I like the term “data driven algorithm“. It makes it clear to everyone involved that what we’re doing is just adjusting an algorithm based on the data we have. No-one in their right minds would confuse that with building a true “A.I.”.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Past Performance is Not Indicative of Future Results (2020)
by tw04 on Saturday July 31, 2021 @01:31PM
(#28020068)
To be frank: that very much does not make it clear to everyone involved. If you told the average Joe you had a “data driven algorithm” instead of “AI” you would likely get a blank stare in return.
Re:Past Performance is Not Indicative of Future Results (2020)
by shreyshnaccount on Saturday July 31, 2021 @04:05PM
(#28021160)
confusion is better than wrongful understanding?
Re:Past Performance is Not Indicative of Future Results (2020)
by spockz on Saturday July 31, 2021 @01:25PM
(#28020004)
What about “data derived algorithm”? The algorithm itself isn’t really driven by data after it has been designed anymore.
Re:Past Performance is Not Indicative of Future Results (2020)
by skohan on Saturday July 31, 2021 @03:37PM
(#28020978)
I mean if we want to be really accurate, we could say something like "highly dimensional data-derived function"
Re:Past Performance is Not Indicative of Future Results (2020)
by shreyshnaccount on Saturday July 31, 2021 @04:23PM
(#28021266)
why stop at that? 'high dimensional matrix parameterised data derived non linear function optimisation and unique hypothesis generation' just rolls off the tongue doesn't it xD