News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pfizer backs down over ‘unreasonable’ terms in South Afri... by pkaye on Thursday July 29, 2021 @02:35AM (#27993507)
Yes you cannot go through a normal court. The US uses a vaccination compensation fund. If someone is harmed by vaccines, they can make a claim with evidence in a special court and the court will determine the compensation. Each dose sold has a 25 cent surcharge to fund these claims. For Covid I think they will do it differently since the government is paying directly.

https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccine-compensation/index.html

Re:Pfizer backs down over ‘unreasonable’ terms in South Afri... by realityking on Thursday July 29, 2021 @02:57AM (#27993636)
The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program doesn’t seem to prevent you from going through a regular court. From your link

> The special master's decision may be appealed and petitioners who reject the decision of the court (or withdraw their petitions within certain timelines) may file a claim in civil court against the vaccine company and/or the health care provider who administered the vaccine.

Re:Pfizer backs down over ‘unreasonable’ terms in South Afri... by refurb on Thursday July 29, 2021 @04:02AM (#27994041)
The FAQs make it seem like it's not as straightforward.

"Most of the time, you must first file and have your claim processed with the VICP before a civil lawsuit can be filed against the vaccine company or the person who gave the vaccine"

Re:Pfizer backs down over ‘unreasonable’ terms in South Afri... by paulddraper on Thursday July 29, 2021 @02:59PM (#28000057)
> The US uses a vaccination compensation fund

So, the same terms as Pfizer was trying to negotiate in South Africa?

Doesn't make it any more/less unreasonable, but the article should at least mention that millions of doses have been given under similar arrangements.

Re:Pfizer backs down over ‘unreasonable’ terms in South Afri... by pkaye on Thursday July 29, 2021 @06:48PM (#28002413)
> demand that the South African government put up sovereign assets guaranteeing an indemnity against the cost of any future legal cases.

The bigger issue was requiring to put up sovereign assets as a guarantee. That is not something Pfizer would ask of the US government.

Re:Pfizer backs down over ‘unreasonable’ terms in South Afri... by paulddraper on Saturday July 31, 2021 @12:16AM (#28015243)
> The US uses a vaccination compensation fund.