mRNA vaccines have been well studied - from a scientific standpoint it's hard to imagine how it even could cause problems.
Here is an example of a long term problem caused by a (traditional, non-mrna) vaccine
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/history/narcoleps...
As far as I know there hasn't been much research into the long term effects of many vaccines. After decades of availability if they were causing issues I hope somebody would have found a connection if they were causing issues. I would very much like to see research into this though.
I do agree mrna vaccines are unlikely to cause long term issues.
Just to be clear. I am very much in favor of vaccines. I just don't like being required to take it so soon after it was created.
So if you trust the decades of mRNA vaccine research, you should consider the vaccine strictly safer than covid, as getting the disease will expose you to everything the vaccine exposes you to.
I believe both mrna and traditional vaccines are safer than covid. I just don't like to take vaccines or medication without longer results than a year. I also agree mRNA vaccines shouldn't have any long term negative effects, but I tend to take the position when in doubt don't take an action.
If in 5 years there hasn't been any widespread negative effects I will probably take it.
This is similar to how flu vaccines vary from year to year, but the mechanisms and changes are well understood so the approval process can be streamlined, but we don't expect issues from this year's flu vaccine that we didn't see last year, even though they are different.
It's already the law, and has been for like half a century (edit: more like 80 years, actually). If you aren't vaccinated you can't attend school. You can't serve in the military. You can't work in many health care fields. We requires our citizenry to be vaccinated against major preventable diseases. We always have.
And this policy is, objectively, the second[1] biggest success story in the last few centuries of public health policy. Period.
Why did no one care about "keeping federal powers in check" in 2019? Why do you only care now? You don't think maybe that there's something polluting your priors?
[1] The invention of antibiotics gets #1.
Unless you get an exemption, which can be requested and are often granted on a variety of grounds.
> We requires our citizenry to be vaccinated against major preventable diseases. We always have.
We clearly don't, though. As a citizen you can be entirely unvaccinated and live a completely normal life.
So yeah sure, if you have a specific medical problem, or very very limited religious reason, you can be exempted from vaccination, which is the same for the COVID vaccine.
Literally nothing has changed, the COVID vaccine is now just part of the list of required vaccines (and as of right now COVID vaccination is actually not required at most universities as they are waiting for final FDA approval which will likely be here sometime in late August).
This is only because the majority of the populace is vaccinated against polio, measles. If the majority of the population was also unvaccinated, these viruses would make life not fun. Most of us live a very sheltered life and have never directly experienced living with measles or polio.
You seem to be arguing technicalities without addressing my point. We have lots and lots of vaccine regulation that ensures that virtually all citizens are immune to diseases like measles, hep, diphtheria, etc... No, it's not absolute, and I don't believe I claimed it was. All policy requires careful tuning.
So let's include covid in the same regime. You agree with that part, right?
2.) You mean the surge in cases that are seeing vaccinated people faring statistically far better than the un-vaccinated? I don't think that it was ever a secret that the vaccine wasn't going to be bulletproof or capable of complete success against all variants, especially variants that didn't exist at the time of development.
There are many more breakthrough cases with the delta variant. That said, the vaccines are still very good at combatting serious illness:
We continue to estimate that the risk of a breakthrough
infection with symptom upon exposure to the Delta variant
is reduced by seven-fold. The reduction of 20-fold for
hospitalizations, and deaths," Walensky said during
Tuesday's briefing.If we could get 70% of the population vaccinated we could be done with this and move on with our lives.
it's dystopian. this is power that won't be reliquished by either major party, just like 9/11 surveillance and security theater. unlike some of currently fashionable political impetuses, this one is worth actively resisting, to keep federal powers in check.