It was also the place with the densest collection of high-achieving, highly intelligent colleagues that I’ve ever experienced.
What even is the point of living if society deems people like me to be inherently inferior for life?
If you saw my resume you’d understand how hopeless it is for people like me. It’s depressing.
EDIT: Don't understand the downvotes. I went to a top liberal arts college and they told us to, if it was over a certain number. It worked broadly speaking.
I did not do well on my SATs (1500/1600) - do you think there's any way to make up for this? Or am I supposed to be as unimpressive as I was at 17 forever?
[1]https://www.thoughtco.com/sat-scores-for-ivy-league-admissio...
I've almost never heard of anyone caring about their SAT scores since freshman/sophomore year of college. The only people who still talk about them are the people who did really well on them complaining that they didn't help get them jobs once they graduated.
Honestly, standardized test scores and some case study type questions would be sufficient to make a decision (along with 1 on 1 convos). I hope a decision like this opens a channel for smart people to get to employment without having to go to school or spend as much time in it.
Edit:
Some people are commenting that relying on scores from years ago can unfairly disadvantage people who have improved since then, and can generally be misleading. I agree with that.
There should be a robust ecosystem of aptitude tests that are generally accepted, are as unbiased (culturally) as possible, and that can be retaken at any time.
I think it's developing, as I've seen some examples of this in the hiring process.