News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Colorado River is shrinking by fooey on Wednesday July 21, 2021 @01:23PM (#27909229)
In Southern Utah, which is part of the Mojave Desert, the farmers still doing plain old flood irrigation.

It's so staggeringly wasteful it's hard to understand

Re:The Colorado River is shrinking by User23 on Wednesday July 21, 2021 @01:26PM (#27909265)
Are there good figures on how much of that water is “wasted” and how much ends up replenishing groundwater reservoirs? Utah isn’t that close to the Pacific so that water has a lot of opportunities to do something other than flow into the ocean.
Re:The Colorado River is shrinking by ajross on Wednesday July 21, 2021 @01:31PM (#27909320)
Virtually all agricultural irrigation evaporates. It doesn't even run off into local streams (which you can verify by, heh, the lack of local streams in the Utah desert), much less seep into the ground.

Underground aquifers fill over decades and centuries, and in this environment, almost always laterally, not from seepage from rainfall. I think the demand for proof needs to go the other way, honestly. Presumptively this water is pretty clearly "wasted".

Re:The Colorado River is shrinking by D13Fd on Wednesday July 21, 2021 @01:37PM (#27909411)
I think the question is how much less water would be used with a modern irrigation system rather than flood irrigation.
Re:The Colorado River is shrinking by tfigment on Wednesday July 21, 2021 @01:48PM (#27909548)
Ostensibly you could grow hydroponically and have very little waste but order of magnitude cost increase in power needs. Every other solution falls in between I guess.
Re:The Colorado River is shrinking by ashtonkem on Wednesday July 21, 2021 @02:02PM (#27909756)
Electricity is orders of magnitude easier to move than water, and its price is dropping too.
Re:The Colorado River is shrinking by User23 on Wednesday July 21, 2021 @06:59PM (#27913235)
> Virtually all agricultural irrigation evaporates. It doesn't even run off into local streams (which you can verify by, heh, the lack of local streams in the Utah desert), much less seep into the ground.

The evaporation figures I can find range from 30% to 50%, which is hardly virtually all. I've never been to the Utah desert, but in the California desert I've dumped out water and watched it disappear into the ground. The absence of streams only indicates that seepage and evaporation together get all of the water that would otherwise flow in them.

> Underground aquifers fill over decades and centuries, and in this environment, almost always laterally, not from seepage from rainfall. I think the demand for proof needs to go the other way, honestly. Presumptively this water is pretty clearly "wasted".

Unconfined aquifers will fill as fast as rainfall can seep in, which depending on the area can be a lot less than decades.

How is letting the Colorado flow into the Pacific more of a "waste" than using that water to grow food and letting the excess seep into the water table and fall as rain on the other side of the Rockies?

Re:The Colorado River is shrinking by ajross on Thursday July 22, 2021 @10:21AM (#27919204)
Those figures are for water that doesn't enter the plants, though. All that water, except for a tiny fraction represented in the shipped output (nuts, whatever) still ends up locally in the air.

And "disappearing into the ground" is absolutely not water entering an aquifer! All you get is wet dirt. Which then... dries out. Again, this isn't how aquifers work.

There's no free lunch here. Growing plants in a desert under the open sky requires a staggering amount of water. It just does. If you want to push efficiency measures look at greenhouses.

Re:The Colorado River is shrinking by User23 on Thursday July 22, 2021 @07:50PM (#27925741)
> Again, this isn't how aquifers work.

Are you confusing confined aquifers and unconfined aquifers? That's exactly how unconfined aquifers work. Where I live the wells never go dry because every time it rains they are replenished.

Maybe the desert doesn't have unconfined aquifers and that's why you're so strident on this? I really don't know, but I'm curious so please elucidate if you can.

Re:The Colorado River is shrinking by fooey on Wednesday July 21, 2021 @01:30PM (#27909306)
I don't know any numbers, but we're over 100 all summer, so I imagine it mostly evaporates.

Flood irrigation here is just as bad as if they were doing it in Phoenix or Las Vegas

Re:The Colorado River is shrinking by brewdad on Wednesday July 21, 2021 @03:34PM (#27911002)
Many of the old neighborhoods and a few remaining urban farms are flood irrigated in Phoenix. The small city park in my old neighborhood was also flooded once a week to keep the grass green all summer.
Re:The Colorado River is shrinking by woolcap on Wednesday July 21, 2021 @01:43PM (#27909480)
nit-pick, but only a tiny portion of Utah is in the Mojave desert.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mojave_Desert

Re:The Colorado River is shrinking by dylan604 on Wednesday July 21, 2021 @02:00PM (#27909727)
While that may be accurate, it's still a lot of acerage that is specifically Mojave. At the same time, if I stand on the border of the Mojave in Utah, I'm still in a desert anywhere I go.
Re:The Colorado River is shrinking by LeifCarrotson on Wednesday July 21, 2021 @03:03PM (#27910591)
Humans love taxonomy, nature does not.

If you stand on the border of the Mojave, you probably have one foot in the Great Basin desert that covers the west half of the state. The parent probably simply described or generalized to the wrong desert.

A climate map [1] shows that the only parts of the state which aren't desert are arid mountains; the Salt Lake area has a bit of lake effect snow but that's not in the Colorado River watershed.

[1] https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/95/Utah_K%C...