News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Programming by Poking: Why MIT Stopped Teaching SICP (2016) by eyelovewe on Tuesday July 20, 2021 @05:57PM (#27899901)
To me, this reads as an admission that software complexity leads to lower determinacy and lower systemic coherence. That bottom up design is dead, at least with regards to the industry they are preparing people for. I still think that SICP teaches sound thinking, as do compositional agglomerative syncretic approaches, even if you never do write any systems in forth.
Re:Programming by Poking: Why MIT Stopped Teaching SICP (2016) by superduperycomb on Tuesday July 20, 2021 @09:25PM (#27901250)
Would you kindly briefly define “compositional agglomerative syncretic approaches”?
Re:Programming by Poking: Why MIT Stopped Teaching SICP (2016) by admash on Tuesday July 20, 2021 @10:01PM (#27901501)
I suspect he would define it as anything the untrained eye would find syntactically indistinguishable from Forth.