Re:Cryptographers unearth vulnerabilities in Telegram's encr...
by lucb1e on Monday July 19, 2021 @03:41PM
(#27886532)
>>Oh don't be so vague, go on and name one!
>See my reply above.
Yeah I saw that. You wrote:
> Not even gonna read it all Have a nice day and keep using whatever you want
so I don't see why I should bother trying to answer your question as well.
Re:Cryptographers unearth vulnerabilities in Telegram's encr...
by noxer on Wednesday July 21, 2021 @05:47PM
(#27912624)
You should not, I dont care which IM app you use or why or why you dont wanna use telegram. And you dont care or understand why people use telegram and what they use it for.
I tried to explain it but people like you dont want to know. You just want to argue over e2ee nonsense that no one cares about who uses telegram for public conversations. You could ask HN to make comments e2ee its about that "useful" for what I use telegram for. I want my messages to be read, its that simple.
Re:Cryptographers unearth vulnerabilities in Telegram's encr...
by maqp on Sunday July 18, 2021 @08:59PM
(#27878168)
So Telegram's ToS conveniently forbids end-to-end encryption plugins. :D That's amazing security design!
Re:Cryptographers unearth vulnerabilities in Telegram's encr...
by noxer on Monday July 19, 2021 @12:20AM
(#27879226)
You are such an idiot
Re:Cryptographers unearth vulnerabilities in Telegram's encr...
by tffgg on Monday July 19, 2021 @02:16AM
(#27879763)
What key features are you talking about?
See my reply above.
>I've been wondering the same thing...
Its not possible (or feasible) to implement the key telegram features in Matrix or other always-e2ee protocols.
>It might be easier to have some sort of plugin that overlays encryption on top of Telegram [...] and everyone needs to use your custom clients.
Its against the telegram api ToS. You are not allowed to implement features that require other parties to download your client. You can only add local features that do not affect other user who use the official client.