EU, China and India all have areas where they want US based firms to store data in a specific way. This isn't changing anytime soon.
I'd be shocked if most big banks in Eastern Europe are owned locally.
The opposite of what you're saying is true for almost every average or small country, economically.
Besides which, India doesn't have a good track record of protecting privacy either.
Sure there are other ways, but India seems to like to go for the most radical solutions at times
So data is spied on just by being routed near them, it is not needed for them to be the destination.
Of course, thats what every country wants, and they develop policies that give tax breaks or concessions to local businesses. That's why tariffs were enacted.
I'm sorry, I don't really get your point, maybe you can restate it?
Your answer, as far as I can discern, is that it "Of course" it is "fair and reasonable that goods sold in India should be made in India, that movies that show in India should be made in India, that all news consumed in India should be written in India."
That's all there is to it, question asked, and answered.
I mean if it is fair and reasonable that Indian transactions should be stored and processed in India, is it not also fair and reasonable that goods sold in India should be made in India, that movies that show in India should be made in India, that all news consumed in India should be written in India?
I get these are not the same, but what is the real difference here? Where does it become unreasonable in my examples and why?