News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:$100M xPrize for Carbon Removal by mabbo on Tuesday July 13, 2021 @03:17PM (#27825030)
Well, most of the carbon in the ground that we're burning are long-buried trees, right? I wonder what it would take to just bury a lot of trees and let them regrow naturally.

This paper has some interesting ideas: https://cbmjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1750-0...

My approach would be to find the best CO2/$ types of trees, buy them straight from the lumber industry, and sequester them in no-longer-used quarries. Just need to figure out a scalable way to ensure anaerobic conditions to help prevent CO2 release on breakdown.

Re:$100M xPrize for Carbon Removal by fy20 on Tuesday July 13, 2021 @03:28PM (#27825158)
At the time coal deposits formed the bacteria that broke down lingin and cellulose hadn't yet evolved, so just burying trees wouldn't work today as they would decay. You could probably burn the wood to produce charcoal (burning it in a low oxygen environment), and the bury that, but just cutting down a forest and burying it won't work.
Re:$100M xPrize for Carbon Removal by ars on Tuesday July 13, 2021 @03:47PM (#27825415)
In a low oxygen, low water environment it would work fine.

For example an old coal mine and then seal it.

Old coal mines are too dangerous for humans to enter so you need some kind of robotics to load them up with trees and other biomatter to bury.

Re:$100M xPrize for Carbon Removal by Method-X on Tuesday July 13, 2021 @04:54PM (#27826200)
This would never scale.
Re:$100M xPrize for Carbon Removal by mumblemumble on Tuesday July 13, 2021 @03:26PM (#27825127)
I'm no chemist, but, wild guess, you might actually make things worse by favoring decomposition into methane instead of CO2.

I would think that a proper solution would require figuring out how to get all that carbon into a chemical form that is chemically stable and won't biodegrade. The ideal looks a whole lot like coal, I'd guess?

Re:$100M xPrize for Carbon Removal by giantg2 on Tuesday July 13, 2021 @03:48PM (#27825438)
Yep methane is multiple times more potent as a greenhouse gas.
Re:$100M xPrize for Carbon Removal by Voloskaya on Tuesday July 13, 2021 @03:20PM (#27825054)
You also need to find a way to speed up tree growth rate by 10x or 100x for this solution to be effective before most of the damage is done.
Re:$100M xPrize for Carbon Removal by BitwiseFool on Tuesday July 13, 2021 @03:20PM (#27825063)
My understanding is that when wood first appeared on Earth nothing was able to decompose all of that cellulose for millions of years until microbes evolved a way to break the molecules apart and feed on them. I don't know if simply burying the trees is enough to sequester it away now that wood decomposes so readily.