News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Does free software benefit from ML models being derived w... by scotty79 on Tuesday July 13, 2021 @03:59AM (#27818569)
GPL doesn't need copyright. It only needs the ability to say "by using this software you agree to ...".

And what follows doesn't need to be completely unrestricted. You might ban for example all clauses that restrict copying this piece of software in any way or using it as is.

Re:Does free software benefit from ML models being derived w... by PeterisP on Tuesday July 13, 2021 @04:14AM (#27818630)
the ability to de facto say "by using this software you agree to ..." is based on copyright - because anybody can refuse the license, saying "by using this you agree to X" is technically a lie (by the way, by reading this comment you agree to send me $1000 worth of BTC within 10 days), "using this" does not make you enter a binding contract, it's just that if you refuse to accept the license, you're infringing on copyright. The licenses are accepted because of threat of a copyright infringement lawsuit. If there was no copyright, people would be free to ignore all such license offers as they would not require a license in the first place.
Re:Does free software benefit from ML models being derived w... by b3morales on Tuesday July 13, 2021 @12:04PM (#27822641)
Indeed, this is stated quite explicitly in the GPL itself:

> ...nothing other than this License grants you permission to propagate or modify any covered work. These actions infringe copyright if you do not accept this License. Therefore, by modifying or propagating a covered work, you indicate your acceptance of this License to do so.