News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Chemical Hunger: Mysteries by tsimionescu on Monday July 12, 2021 @04:51PM (#27814963)
It's true, but uninteresting. Insisting on this truth is harmful, because it makes an assumption that people can just choose to eat less without any negative consequences. People love pretending that calories in is simply a matter of rational choice, not a complex result of our inner machinery.

We are biological machines, and the amount we eat is biologically determined by our bodies (assuming food is widely available). We can somewhat influence that with rational thought, but to a limited degree, just like we can choose to breathe in faster or slower, but we can't maintain that for any length of time.

Re:A Chemical Hunger: Mysteries by JoeAltmaier on Monday July 12, 2021 @05:16PM (#27815244)
Hey I'm all aboard that. It's under the umbrella of "psychological".
Re:A Chemical Hunger: Mysteries by tsimionescu on Tuesday July 13, 2021 @12:56AM (#27817743)
"Psychological" has certain implications that ultimately this is under the individual's control, it's all in their had and they can fix it.

If it is endocrine instead, we would be looking for a drug to fix it, or a specific pollutant that could be removed. No one will tell you 'hey, it's your thyroid, just make it go a little faster'.