News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tencent deploys facial recognition to detect minors gamin... by gambiting on Wednesday July 07, 2021 @05:35AM (#27759180)
>>You can be certain that you end up in a database if you use a foreign SIM card from a non-KYC-country for a long period of time in a residential area. Your only defence is your network provider not cooperating unless forced by law.

I've literally been doing this for the last 11 years, guess I'm screwed then :P

>>They were already taken when you had¹ to get the ID in the first place.

Yes, and the mobile operator doesn't get them, while in the article discussed it's the "private" operator gathering all this data.

>>SIM cards are used for transmitting voice in an insecure fashion, so you can't be sure.

The difference being, that here it's done openly and in a visible fashion "either you do this, or you can't play our games".

>>¹ The federal republic directly adopted laws from nazi germany requiring ID for every citizen.

That sounds about on a level with an argument that since Hitler was vegetarian, all vegetarians are nazis. Your country adopted a lot of laws from the Third Reich. Mine adopted a lot of laws from the communist republic it once was. Neither fact makes those countries anything like their predecessors. The law that every citizen has to have an ID is a good one IMHO(wait for Americans to chime in and say this is against their personal freedom or something).

Re:Tencent deploys facial recognition to detect minors gamin... by rotebeete on Wednesday July 07, 2021 @06:45AM (#27759521)
> The difference being, that here it's done openly and in a visible fashion "either you do this, or you can't play our games".

So hidden surveillance is more ok than open violations?

> That sounds about on a level with an argument that since Hitler was vegetarian, all vegetarians are nazis.

I just wanted to explain why germans have to have an ID.

Re:Tencent deploys facial recognition to detect minors gamin... by gambiting on Wednesday July 07, 2021 @08:01AM (#27760099)
>>So hidden surveillance is more ok than open violations?

I knew someone would inevitably come to this conclusion.

No, of course it's not better. But this article is very specifically about an open and overt gathering of biometric data.