News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cryptocurrency Blockchains Don’t Need to Be Energy Intensive by 22c on Monday July 05, 2021 @08:44PM (#27743222)
> button-clicking and datacenter-construction

Which of these two scenarios seems to favour the rich, in your mind?

Re:Cryptocurrency Blockchains Don’t Need to Be Energy Intensive by m3kw9 on Tuesday July 06, 2021 @10:03AM (#27748702)
They both favour in different ways. You’d need to have huge initial capital, time and energy for mining, that’s quite a barrier to entry. Staking you’d need just large capital as the barrier.

I would say it’s harder to compete with miners than stakers.

Re:Cryptocurrency Blockchains Don’t Need to Be Energy Intensive by atweiden on Monday July 05, 2021 @09:36PM (#27743431)
Running a proof-of-work mining business isn’t risk-free: being wealthy alone is no guarantee of success. Conversely, with button clicking for autoyield, success is all but guaranteed.

There’s really no comparison. Running a business with high fixed and variable costs, and considerable competition is far more difficult to pull off successfully than a passive investment. Which one do you think favours a “gilded elite” more?

Re:Cryptocurrency Blockchains Don’t Need to Be Energy Intensive by 22c on Tuesday July 06, 2021 @02:09AM (#27744727)
You're operating on the assumption that the elite make their money passively.

Putting money in a bank isn't even enough to keep up with inflation at the moment, the same is true for Proof of Stake coins, too.