I'm not sure I spend less time actually coding stuff (because I have to review the Copilot code). But the cost of the code I write is definitely reduced, because:

- the review from my peers is faster (the code is more correct) - I come back less to the code (because I have thought about all the corner cases when checking the copilot code) - As I care more about naming & inline docs (it helps copilot), the code is actually cheaper to maintain.

Check out how it helped me write a React component: https://twitter.com/francoisz/status/1409919670803742734

I think hit the Tab key more than I hit any other key ;)

I can't see anything due to the variable bitrate.

Having been a TabNine user for a while I can say that it's less of a productivity boost and more of a quality of life win. It's hard to measure - not because it's small, but because it's lots of tiny wins, or wins at just the right moment. It makes me happy, and that's why I pay for it - the fact that it's probably also saving me some time is second to the fact that it saves me from annoying interrupts.

In addition, I would like to see GitHub reviewing my code & giving me suggestions on how I could improve. That will be more educative & a tool to ensure consistency across code.

I'm surprised this doesn't exist. Google, FB, and Apple (and I imagine Microsoft) have a lot of this stuff built in that is light-years better than any open source solution I'm aware of.

Given that MS owns GitHub and how valuable this is - I imagine it will be coming soon.

SonarQube and IntelliJ does it in some way for me.

+1 for SonarQube. Very easy way to add value to a project without a lot of overhead.

I tried TabNine and it wasn’t a huge improvement because what costs the most time isn’t typing stuff but thinking about what to type.