ganzuul

I conclude that if you perform horrific experiments on animals then our intelligent universe reduces the rate at which you can continue to 10bps.

This is why enlightenment cures you of your curiosity.

Oh, okay I think I understand.

This would have to scale down to the quantum domain to be an actual thing and scaling back up means we bring non-commutative physics into the classical world.

I was actually thinking of the engineering-minded people who experiment with permanent magnet electric motors out of intuition. The bit about free energy was hyperbole of mine.

From 2021:

https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.05820 This is the numerical discovery.

I'm trying to decide if we are intentionally 'translating' these ideas from pure imagination down into technological applications through intermediate 'realms' of quasi-reality, or if building stuff with just intuition can still be accepted in the 21st century. The BS is just piled too high for me and my trust in technology is not great. Sometimes I wonder if we are just having a mass psychosis in a field of mud.

...So I'm advanced?

This means I'm advanced.

It makes you question what they mean by discovery. Is it not a discovery until it is published in Nature? On Arxiv this was a discovery in 2021. We can probably find a free energy channel in the YouTube haystack from a decade ago where the guy happened to arrange magnets in this order while going through permutations. Is that discovery or are only incumbent academics allowed to canonize science?

Complex systems studies is wisdom. We know how communication on internet behaves. Conway's Law hits hard and the processes of life are not dumb.

Access to physical reality is important when negotiating with the beings that can form under this constraint. People have apparently known this instinctively for a very long time and they are not going to give in to the demands of the AI industry.

It's a great mistake to humanize everything in your consciousness.

Unless the surrounding system is already at infinite entropy.

Is this discretization of gyroscopic effects?

It's not a very human medium, so it is not man who is implicated.

I doubt it? Stuff only works because we can't punch each other over the internet.

There are lots of entities out there that assume consent.

The price of olive oil has gone up significantly.

Zoom in.

It is like an attempt to do psychic battle over the meaning of "disruption".

Is it region-locked?

Chemistry is my own path-not-taken. Plenty of room at the bottom.

It's not about the money?

That is why we invented God.

Doubt.

There are people like that. We don't know what's up with them.

We are repeating the COVID virus scare but this time with software. Most people don't know the difference so this is respectful.

> ...this has seemingly infinite flexibility based on so little and that's just incredible.

What makes it little? This is the difference between von Neumann architecture and Harvard architecture.

Imagine you have a past life review in a near death experience and 15% of your memories are ads.

I'll hack mine so that when it decides if I should die in a crash or run someone over, it is biased to be 100% ageist so it avoids anyone younger than me.

> Are there any game developers working on infinite story games?

To me this basically describes God, once you get all the mods and DLC.

They have nowhere to go if they do so no. Realization is transcendental.

Algorithms are to Gen-Z like GMO is to Millennials.

Spiral out and keep going?