Balancing transparency with an individual's right to privacy is a tricky subject.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-downside-of-full-pay-transp...
Also, defining the problem by first principles, this effect kind of makes sense. 80% of people think their performance is above average, which collides head-on with reality.
Add the effects of Group Bias and you have a recipe for constant infighting, jealousy and misery.
The salary shown in our skattelisten (tax list) is what's called the general income. That is: All taxable income, minus deductions. This means that the income you see in our tax list is going to be lower, than what it is in reality.
It could also appear much higher, if you've sold something which counts as taxable income, done consulting/side gigs, etc.
I didn't reply back. But, the recruiter told me much more than she think she did with that statement.
They always try to project a progressive and relaxed image, but you better do not try to deviate from the norm. The norm is: Work for a low salary, buy a tiny overpriced house from the ruling classes, eat sandwiches with peanut butter and celebrate Queen's day.
Surveillance levels are high but covert, extrajudicial punishment is enshrined in the law.
Also only Americans eat peanut butter in significant quantity no?
Maybe you meant the EU (genuinely, not a dig), in which case you could be right. In Europe however we in the UK have a big fondness for peanut butter too.
Norway: The country where no salaries are secret https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-40669239
Removing anonymity of searching made a significant difference as did letting you know who looked you up. This is a form of social pressure that seems to balance out their need for transparency versus the "peeping tom" aspect of open salary data.
There are some less than good social impacts but I'd say on balance the overall result is positive.
I actually think any job ad without a salary indication should be seen with suspicion and mistrust. Its basically false or deceptive advertising. Its like going to a shop to buy some fruit but them being sheepish about the price. Negotiations then ensue and you give them an offer and they say "that isn’t realistic". But you easily counter with "well you should have listed the price". The ensuing negotiation includes sich phrases as "you should know the market" and all sorts of "competitive market" slogans.
In the end they simply want to clamp the price down and take advantage of ignorance rather than any kind of ethical stance. We tolerate this unethical behavior because "that's how it is".