News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:No evidence that chance meetings in office boosts innovation by throwkeep on Thursday June 24, 2021 @11:07AM (#27618698)
To illustrate how easy it is to inject a racial angle into anything, here's Brandeis University on why "picnic" is oppressive language:

https://www.brandeis.edu/parc/accountability/oppressivelangu...

[edit] They just removed it. Here's what they had previously: https://archive.is/NR0Zj

Re:No evidence that chance meetings in office boosts innovation by TurkishPoptart on Thursday June 24, 2021 @03:18PM (#27622576)
I can't believe this nonsense. This is Maoist at the core - it's requiring everything in our language and culture to be re-examined under a petty lens and for what? To appease people who could possibly complain about something? To me it sounds like cultural decay - when life is too good and consumer good are in abundance, petty people have to come up with new problems and dragons to slay to justify their $60,000 administrator salaries.
Re:No evidence that chance meetings in office boosts innovation by hn_throwaway_99 on Thursday June 24, 2021 @11:10AM (#27618756)
Lol, even the phrase "Trigger warning" is too triggering!
Re:No evidence that chance meetings in office boosts innovation by lallysingh on Thursday June 24, 2021 @11:15AM (#27618830)
Picnic's not on the list?
Re:No evidence that chance meetings in office boosts innovation by bumbledraven on Thursday June 24, 2021 @11:21AM (#27618915)
It’s in a snapshot from earlier today: https://archive.is/NR0Zj

> The term picnic is often associated with lynchings of Black people in the United States, during which white spectators were said to have watched while eating, referring to them as picnics or other terms involving racial slurs against Black people.

Re:No evidence that chance meetings in office boosts innovation by mattbk1 on Thursday June 24, 2021 @11:24AM (#27618955)
Snopes disagrees, maybe why they removed it: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/picnic-origin/
Re:No evidence that chance meetings in office boosts innovation by hn_throwaway_99 on Thursday June 24, 2021 @11:35AM (#27619121)
The "rule of thumb" etymology is also bullshit but it's still there: https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/bs-xpm-1998-04-17-19981070...
Re:No evidence that chance meetings in office boosts innovation by lallysingh on Friday June 25, 2021 @04:19AM (#27628336)
Reading that, it wasn't established last, but I didn't find any other definition for that term in the article. I'm pretty groggy, did I miss it?
Re:No evidence that chance meetings in office boosts innovation by hn_throwaway_99 on Friday June 25, 2021 @01:43PM (#27633999)
From the link:

The false etymology persists despite the Oxford English Dictionary definition: "A method or procedure derived entirely from practice or experience, without any basis in scientific knowledge; a roughly practical method." The OED dates the phrase's first reference to 1692.

In the Encyclopedia of Word and Phrase Origins, "rule of thumb" is additionally defined as a method by which brewers once tested the temperature of a batch of beer: They dipped a thumb in the brew.

Re:No evidence that chance meetings in office boosts innovation by hn_throwaway_99 on Thursday June 24, 2021 @11:26AM (#27618981)
Wow, they literally must have just changed this, I looked like 30 mins ago and it was there.
Re:No evidence that chance meetings in office boosts innovation by astrange on Thursday June 24, 2021 @02:36PM (#27621994)
This is why you should always wait a week before reacting to news stories, they usually take care of themselves.