Re:No evidence that chance meetings in office boosts innovation
by hn_throwaway_99 on Thursday June 24, 2021 @11:35AM
(#27619121)
The "rule of thumb" etymology is also bullshit but it's still there: https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/bs-xpm-1998-04-17-19981070...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:No evidence that chance meetings in office boosts innovation
by lallysingh on Friday June 25, 2021 @04:19AM
(#27628336)
Reading that, it wasn't established last, but I didn't find any other definition for that term in the article. I'm pretty groggy, did I miss it?
Re:No evidence that chance meetings in office boosts innovation
by hn_throwaway_99 on Friday June 25, 2021 @01:43PM
(#27633999)
From the link:
The false etymology persists despite the Oxford English Dictionary definition: "A method or procedure derived entirely from practice or experience, without any basis in scientific knowledge; a roughly practical method." The OED dates the phrase's first reference to 1692.
In the Encyclopedia of Word and Phrase Origins, "rule of thumb" is additionally defined as a method by which brewers once tested the temperature of a batch of beer: They dipped a thumb in the brew.