News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A backlash against gender ideology is starting in univers... by smoldesu on Wednesday June 23, 2021 @06:57PM (#27611613)
> To me it's pretty clear the person I was responding to had zero frame of reference to what discrimination feels like, which is why I said so.

I sympathize with you here, I really do: but making such broad assumptions is a bad way to foster real, productive conversations. Identity and queerness are deeply personal topics with all sorts of nuance and interplay between them. I appreciate that you're living your truth, but coming off with this "scorched earth" rhetoric isn't going to win you any fans.

Re:A backlash against gender ideology is starting in univers... by dougmwne on Wednesday June 23, 2021 @07:10PM (#27611726)
Can you unpack "scorched earth rhetoric" for me? I am clearly upset that someone tried to stuff me back in the closet, but isn't that a natural reaction? I think it's fairly generous to share my personal experiences in the hopes that someone out there might learn how to better respect others.
Re:A backlash against gender ideology is starting in univers... by smoldesu on Wednesday June 23, 2021 @07:23PM (#27611846)
Well, it starts from your first line.

> It's only weird to you because you are almost certainly straight, cis and male. Let me explain.

I don't think that's a fair assessment, and it's certainly not a true generalization. I'm not cis, but I completely understand how weird the concept of "coming out" is. Nobody wants to put you back in the closet, we just want to discuss how much the current paradigm surrounding sexuality sucks.

Re:A backlash against gender ideology is starting in univers... by dougmwne on Wednesday June 23, 2021 @07:48PM (#27612078)
My priors on who is most likely to have low empathy for minorities are pretty strong. I bet I am right, but could be wrong:)

I agree that "coming out" takes some explanation. You're going to have an easier time explaining it to some people than others. A shared experience certainly helps! Otherwise you're left trying to explain what blue looks like to someone who's never seen it.

Why does the current paradigm suck? There is unprecedented LGBT acceptance, and that does not suck. There are no sucky paradigms around jeans vs. khakis because there isn't a cohort of people who would prefer if khakis were banned in public.

Re:A backlash against gender ideology is starting in univers... by smoldesu on Wednesday June 23, 2021 @08:05PM (#27612218)
> Why does the current paradigm suck?

From great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparent post:

> This was ironically one of the things that was hardest about coming out as gay, for me. Nobody ever treated me the same way again. I was either uncomfortably praised or silently judged, with practically no in-between. Suffice to say, my sexuality is on a need-to-know basis, now.

Re:A backlash against gender ideology is starting in univers... by dougmwne on Wednesday June 23, 2021 @08:40PM (#27612494)
That does suck, but isn't this exactly why LGBT stories need to be shared instead of hidden? I have lived in more and less accepting places. In the less accepting places, I have experienced the unwanted praise and judgement. In the more accepting places I have been treated as a regular old person with a regular old life. And I think the world is moving more and more towards that place of boring acceptance, and that is just an awesome thing. I am forever grateful to the people who put in all that hard work so I can go about my life. And in gratitude I will keep talking about mine, and keep helping other people who aren't being heard to be heard as well.
Re:A backlash against gender ideology is starting in univers... by kelnos on Wednesday June 23, 2021 @11:20PM (#27613561)
For what it's worth, I didn't read any "scorched earth" rhetoric in dougmwme's original post. I thought it was a reasoned argument, well-explained, in a way that gave me a really interesting perspective on the situation (as someone who has heard and thought about these sorts of perspectives often).

Maybe read it after applying the principle of charity, without assuming the writer is angrily banging on the keyboard, and instead is being thoughtful and trying to teach?