So this would also apply to say, racial slurs and personal insults. Calling someone a name or the n-word instead of their name, that's a freedom? What about antisemitic slurs or insulting disabled people? How about just referring to women as sex objects, that's also within that rule. As well as doing the same for children or the deceased.
You don't expect people to be insulted by such things? Are you serious?
I don't think you actually mean what you say.
That's actually a crime, you know that, right, it's not freedom of speech. Using racial slurs is a crime in most environments as well.
There is no right to say arbitrary things in front of arbitrary people. That's actually not a thing.
It's not "your freedom" that's being violated, there never was one there to begin with here.
The list of things at the forefront of you mind would fall under the above. You might get your teeth kicked in but by the actual freedom of speech definition rather than your own truths interpretation there would be no legal response.
It's true however that we don't actually subscribe to that definition any more, so you never know. Maybe you'll have your wish.
Case laws have upheld them numerous times. This isn't "interpreted truths", racial slurs have been interpreted as intent and such things have been prosecuted.
Margaret Thatcher once said: "Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't."
https://pbfcomics.com/comics/bear-boy/