News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What the Crypto Crowd Doesn’t Understand About Economics by johnklos on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @11:07AM (#27592616)
This is about cryptocurrency, NOT crypto. The article name, at least, should have "sic" to indicate that it's a copy of something which is incorrect.
Re:What the Crypto Crowd Doesn’t Understand About Economics by xyzzyz on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @11:12AM (#27592671)
You are fighting a war for good cause, but this war has already been lost. Crypto means crypto currencies at this point, whether you want it or not.
Re:What the Crypto Crowd Doesn’t Understand About Economics by ska on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @11:18AM (#27592744)
For what it is worth “[sic]” does not mean that something is incorrect, just indicates it is a direct copy of another source. Could be an error or typo, could just be idiosyncratic, archaic, or potentially confusing.

In your case it would not be appropriate, because like it or not the quote usage has become normal usage. I understand why that annoys people, but it’s done.

Re:What the Crypto Crowd Doesn’t Understand About Economics by haste410 on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @11:11AM (#27592663)
Crypto has become a shorthand for cryptocurrency. Google "crypto" and see what comes up.
Re:What the Crypto Crowd Doesn’t Understand About Economics by ape4 on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @11:13AM (#27592695)
Yeah sadly, it bugs me too. Also when somebody says "turn on the air" they probably are referring to air conditioning.
Re:What the Crypto Crowd Doesn’t Understand About Economics by OskarS on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @11:12AM (#27592681)
It's standard usage at this point, adding a [sic] would not be correct. You should climb down from this hill.
Re:What the Crypto Crowd Doesn’t Understand About Economics by brujoand on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @11:12AM (#27592675)
Times (and words) are changing