Re:Nixos-unstable’s ISO_minimal.x86_64-Linux is 100% reprodu...
by quarantine on Sunday June 20, 2021 @05:39PM
(#27574167)
Nix/Nixpkgs blocks unfree packages by default, so I presume it would be relatively easy to disable packages with the `unFree` attribute.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Nixos-unstable’s ISO_minimal.x86_64-Linux is 100% reprodu...
by jnxx on Sunday June 20, 2021 @05:46PM
(#27574192)
I totally believe it is possible, it is perhaps more of a cultural thing.
Re:Nixos-unstable’s ISO_minimal.x86_64-Linux is 100% reprodu...
by eptcyka on Sunday June 20, 2021 @05:50PM
(#27574226)
It's the pragmatic thing. I wouldn't use nixOS if I wasn't able to use it on a 16 core modern desktop. I don't think there's a performant and 100% FLOSS compatible computer that wouldn't make me want to gouge my eyes out with a rusty spoon when building stuff for ARM.
Re:Nixos-unstable’s ISO_minimal.x86_64-Linux is 100% reprodu...
by zamadatix on Sunday June 20, 2021 @05:59PM
(#27574277)
Talos has 44 core/176 thread server options which can take 2 TBs of DDR4 that are FSF certified. The board firmware is also open and has reproducible builds.
Re:Nixos-unstable’s ISO_minimal.x86_64-Linux is 100% reprodu...
by tadfisher on Sunday June 20, 2021 @06:40PM
(#27574510)
That is way more expensive than a 16-core desktop, though. Workstations are a class above consumer-grade desktops and that's reflected in the price.
Re:Nixos-unstable’s ISO_minimal.x86_64-Linux is 100% reprodu...
by zamadatix on Monday June 21, 2021 @05:02PM
(#27584441)
Talos have as low as 8 core desktop options as well this is just an example of how far you can take FLOSS hardware. Not that I consider a 16 core x86 desktop "consumer-grade" in the first place (speaking as a 5950X owner).
Probably not fit for replacing Grandma's budget PC but then again grandma probably isn't worried about the ARM cross compile performance of their machine running NixOS either.
Re:Nixos-unstable’s ISO_minimal.x86_64-Linux is 100% reprodu...
by tadfisher on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @01:03PM
(#27594193)
Okay, now I'm interested :)
(I am worried about the ARM cross compile performance of my machine running NixOS)
Re:Nixos-unstable’s ISO_minimal.x86_64-Linux is 100% reprodu...
by eptcyka on Sunday June 20, 2021 @06:38PM
(#27574497)
Thanks, I was legitimately unaware of this option. That does smash my argument, but I'm not likely to be using a system like that anytime soon due to cost concerns mostly.