Re:Prossimo – Memory safety for the Internet's most critical...
by wmf on Friday June 18, 2021 @11:25PM
(#27557473)
IMO a secure system with a developer mode switch is a better tradeoff than "please don't fix bugs because I need them to jailbreak". Unfortunately almost everybody is leaving out the developer mode switch.
Re:Prossimo – Memory safety for the Internet's most critical...
by pcwalton on Sunday June 20, 2021 @11:15PM
(#27575954)
Is it also authoritarianism when Linux fixes local root exploits? Or syscall RCE?
Re:Prossimo – Memory safety for the Internet's most critical...
by pjmlp on Saturday June 19, 2021 @03:25AM
(#27558531)
Memory safety system programming languages exist since early 1960's and already by 1980 it was known that UNIX and C were a disservice to mankind, sadly profit and free beer OS was more appealing than security.
The only thing we are giving up is cowboy programming.
Re:Prossimo – Memory safety for the Internet's most critical...
by wtetzner on Thursday July 01, 2021 @03:11PM
(#27703215)
Isn't the authoritarianism in the fact that the hardware you buy doesn't let you just install your own firmware?
"Memory safety" has the word "safety" in it, but really it's just a tool to help developers avoid bugs. I want to be able to install whatever I like on my hardware, but I certainly don't want other people to be able to install whatever they want on my hardware.
Re:Prossimo – Memory safety for the Internet's most critical...
by Sunscratch on Monday June 21, 2021 @06:19AM
(#27577821)
Let me rephrase your comment:
“Saving people from suicides is come kind of fascism and authoritarianism - no more freedom to make decisions related to your own life.”
As the infamous quote says, "Those who give up freedom for security deserve neither."