Those classes covered things which I have never encountered in my _trade_, but which formatively affected my views on how one should treat others (or treat oneself). I feel like the stereotypical "liberal arts" education, in which one studies things that are not just focused on your trade, has an intrinsic value which is hard to articulate.
Of course not everyone is autodidactic so the path is not for everyone, but it is indeed quite possible to acquire this kind of knowledge/humanity outside of the university structure.
Alternatively: everyone should read the classics.
Also sometimes it's just cool to have the guy who wrote the textbook be your professor.
- Someone who knows those books to explain and lead discussions about them.
- A place to hold those meetings.
- Some kind of accountability for actually doing the readings, writing the papers, and internalizing some understanding.
That costs a little more than $1.50 but it has no right to cost $150k. It's not like graduate student wages are expensive.
When my children get old enough I hope to attend with them. I had the great fortune to experience a Great Books program for 2-3 years in high school (a pet project of a teacher who fought tooth and nail to fund that class) and consider it a formative experience.
Just to point out that much like working at a high level in tech, a degree is actually not a hard pre-requisite to having an understanding of the humanities, ethics, etc.
Also just like STEM, many will absolutely benefit from the structure of a university setting.
I just couldn’t resist the Good Will Hunting quote.
Maybe a better system in modern times would be a combination of mentoring with official recommendations and travel (to broaden horizons).