News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Incentives in economics are wrong, but how? by closeparen on Friday June 11, 2021 @05:58PM (#27479006)
Missing:

- Someone who knows those books to explain and lead discussions about them.

- A place to hold those meetings.

- Some kind of accountability for actually doing the readings, writing the papers, and internalizing some understanding.

That costs a little more than $1.50 but it has no right to cost $150k. It's not like graduate student wages are expensive.

Re:Incentives in economics are wrong, but how? by wahern on Friday June 11, 2021 @06:34PM (#27479326)
Interestingly, my neighborhood public library in the Outer Richmond district of San Francisco offers free Great Books-style discussion groups. I never attended a session but always noticed the schedule on the bulletin board. Googling it just now, it's apparently led by members of the Great Books Council of San Francisco (https://www.greatbooksncal.org/).

When my children get old enough I hope to attend with them. I had the great fortune to experience a Great Books program for 2-3 years in high school (a pet project of a teacher who fought tooth and nail to fund that class) and consider it a formative experience.

Re:Incentives in economics are wrong, but how? by eunoia on Friday June 11, 2021 @06:35PM (#27479333)
Yeah to be clear I don’t mean to say a liberal arts education is literally only worth $1.50. I personally place immense value on learning.

Just to point out that much like working at a high level in tech, a degree is actually not a hard pre-requisite to having an understanding of the humanities, ethics, etc.

Also just like STEM, many will absolutely benefit from the structure of a university setting.

I just couldn’t resist the Good Will Hunting quote.