News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a... by michaelt on Friday June 11, 2021 @11:36AM (#27474754)
> What does effort mean in this context?

One school of thought says there are men on dating websites who copy-paste a message saying "hey how you doing?" to every woman they see; and that women are beset by hundreds of copy-pasted messages from men who haven't even read their profile.

This school of thought says, in order to stand out, men should carefully compose a different clever, charming message for each woman they contact, based on things the recipient mentions in their profile and suchlike.

Of course, a man sending 100 copy-pasted messages and a man sending 5 high-quality messages might be expending the same amount of effort in total but the latter is demonstrating greater effort per woman

In this context, kogepathic means more men should adopt the strategy of carefully composing messages.

Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a... by BitwiseFool on Friday June 11, 2021 @11:42AM (#27474825)
You also have the problem of writing dozens and dozens of seemingly engaging and individualized messages only to get no response back. So eventually, you start putting less and less effort into each message and even start to repeat old ones. It's a sad fact of life.
Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a... by twalla on Friday June 11, 2021 @11:51AM (#27474911)
When I was dating I was fortunate to have a large enough match pool to experiment with this. The result: a stupid copy-pasted throwaway line or emoji had roughly the same results as a message I put some thought into. The second category got a few more responses but in terms of conversion to an actual date there wasn't an appreciable difference.

The takeaway for me is profile pictures, physical appearance and class/status signifiers (vacations, hobbies, nice things in/around the picture) were all that mattered and if someone was sold on that all you really had to do was not get in your own way by saying something stupid.

Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a... by kogepathic on Friday June 11, 2021 @12:14PM (#27475191)
> You also have the problem of writing dozens and dozens of seemingly engaging and individualized messages only to get no response back.

To use a property analogy: if I am not the highest offer on a house, I probably won't get it. Doesn't matter if I have a trust fund or work for minimum wage (effort put into the offer) my offer wasn't accepted.

Similarly if I'm the seller, I can decide "No, actually I don't want to sell my house to BlackRock, I'd rather sell it to this young family" and that's entirely my choice. This choice might leave money on the table, but at least I get the warm fuzzy feels inside for doing what I think is best.

What you describe sounds like you want some kind of "thank you for putting in some effort" but you decide the amount of effort to invest, the other party owes you nothing.

Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a... by BitwiseFool on Friday June 11, 2021 @12:40PM (#27475511)
You're right, the ideal solution is to keep putting in the effort to be sincere and engaging. I certainly don't believe I am entitled to a response. I'm just trying to convey how demoralizing it can be to put your best foot forward so many times only for nothing to come from it. I think it's human nature to be tempted to slack when your big efforts have had so little payoff.
Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a... by jfengel on Friday June 11, 2021 @02:46PM (#27477054)
I assure you, women feel the same way. It's incredibly demoralizing to receive hundreds of swipes, of which the vast majority produce only a copypaste first message. Or worse, "DTF?", of which they'll see plenty.

It's hard to say which is worse: the messages that say that they haven't put any thought into you at all, or the messages that say they have exactly one thought about you -- and everybody else.

Everybody gets poor payoff percentages. You play if you think the game is worth the candle.

Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a... by Dylan16807 on Friday June 11, 2021 @08:13PM (#27480056)
Can't the woman just pick someone to talk to and then get a real response most of the time? Even if it's 10% that's really easy to get.

While if a guy wants a proper conversation... get lucky punk?

Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a... by jfengel on Saturday June 12, 2021 @11:26AM (#27485109)
All day can say is I never had any problems finding a woman to talk to. It wasn't hard. There are lots of fish in that sea. All I had to do was be thoughtful, polite, and interesting.

I'm told it's different in other places but I suspect that has more to do with the men than the women.

Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a... by Dylan16807 on Saturday June 12, 2021 @03:05PM (#27486728)
Well if it's not hard then that invalidates the conversation chain I was replying to.

You're saying the "it's not hard" situation is similarly demoralizing to what women face? Sure I guess.

But BitwiseFool was describing a situation where it's extremely hard to get a reply, and that is much more demoralizing because there's no easy fix.

Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a... by jfengel on Sunday June 13, 2021 @10:55AM (#27493145)
I never found it hard to get a reply. I don't really know what I was doing right that everyone else seems to be doing wrong. I'm neither excessively handsome nor wealthy.

My suspicion is that I worked to make myself interesting, and worth conversing with. And I see a lot of comments here that betray a deep distrust of women, with a ton of stereotyping and lack of empathy. I hear tons of complaints from women about men's profiles, and it never has to do with looks or money.

I've sometimes thought of opening a dating profile consultancy. I may be completely off base, but I believe that in a lot of cases, men can do better without changing jobs or their appearance. And my first piece of free advice is that if you're blaming women, women aren't going to like you.

Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a... by the_only_law on Sunday June 13, 2021 @11:05AM (#27493223)
> My suspicion is that I worked to make myself interesting, and worth conversing with.

In what sort of ways are you “ interesting”? Genuinely curious. FWIW most advice I’ve seen regarding advice for dating profiles (particularly for guys) involves removing anything that might signify personality and to make it as formulaic as possible. Your pictures all have to be the right things, the profile description can’t be too short or too long, and can only say certain things, etc. I think on these sort of apps it’s almost seen as positive to be as basic as possible. Even I find myself suspicious of profiles that say to much or try to stand out now.

The other piece of advice I see almost always has to do with quality of pictures, which is understandable, but let’s be real, if I had the kind of life where I was happy all the time, doing cool things and taking pictures with friends, I probably wouldn’t need to be on this app ;)

Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a... by jfengel on Sunday June 13, 2021 @11:47AM (#27493548)
I'm sure there are some women who want blank slates for men, but not the type of women I like. I like to post vacation and activity pictures, and use the text to suggest that I've got stories to share on our first date.

So many women I've met complain that they start the date with "so tell me about yourself" and get, "uh I dunno. I like to play video games." (Not that there's anything wrong with video games but at least have some stories to tell. Maybe she'll also play. Jackpot. Unless you start telling her she's not a real games.)

I do lots of things. I act, i juggle, i run marathons. The tricky part is phrasing it in a way that doesn't come off as "I'm too cool an expect you to shut up and listen."

That is of course just what works for me, and for the kind of women I like. (Talking about dating sites is a really easy topic of conversation on a first date, so I hear a lot.)

If they're telling you to be dull, maybe that works for other men with other women. But to me it sounds like a recipe for a boring date.

I try to go in with the attitude that if we do nothing more than spend a few minutes chatting nicely over coffee, it will have been fun and worth my time. That kind of attitude seems best for making myself seem worthwhile and fun, so that she wants more.

Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a... by the_only_law on Sunday June 13, 2021 @11:57AM (#27493639)
Sure, I wasn’t commenting on the preferences of women, but more of the culture of dating apps, which seem to reduce people to some photos and a few snippets of text. From what I hear women have their own crap to put up with on those platforms.
Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a... by ALittleLight on Friday June 11, 2021 @06:16PM (#27479162)
I think you're being a bit unfair. The parent comment describes a hardship, investing time, effort, and some sense of self-worth and seeing it vanish into nothing, and your response makes the parent seem entitled. "Like you want some kind of 'thank you for putting in some effort.'

If someone told you they were having a hard time buying a house and all their offers were silently rejected replying "The sellers owe you nothing" might be true, but it is beside the point.

Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a... by throwaway306744 on Saturday June 12, 2021 @12:55AM (#27481652)
> the other party owes you nothing.

No, that's an aberration perpetrated by software. The same problem has manifested in interviewing. Maybe you're thinking of "nobody owes you sex" instead?

If you greet a person in real life or over a call and they intentionally ignore you, they are being rude. Obviously, if you're being rude first, that's different. They can say "hey" back, or "sorry, I'm not interested" or "kind of busy right now, can we pick this up later?" There are plenty of options.

I understand that the way these apps are set up, responding like this isn't a winning strategy. Despite what the Internet would have you believe, there is a minimum social bar when there's a human on the other end of a comm channel.

Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a... by majormajor on Friday June 11, 2021 @04:27PM (#27478048)
Putting too much effort into those messages is a trap I fell into in the past when looking for relationships on dating apps. You've seen a few pics and read a couple sentences of text they typed - you shouldn't read too much into it for your own sake, and you also don't want to look like you're too eager to jump into something way too fast.

(Looking for hookups on apps is, I imagine, an entirely different ballgame, and I have no idea what works or doesn't work there.)

Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a... by rowanG077 on Friday June 11, 2021 @04:16PM (#27477917)
I doubt this is true. I almost always have send out personalised messages if possible (E.g. comment on something in their profile, something noteworthy in their fotos or something else). They just almost never respond(I would say <<5% even respond), and if they respond it's not much beyond an: "haha thank you" or something empty like that, with no follow up of any kind. It was impossible to keep any kind of conversation going no matter what I tried.

Now? I just gave up. I have better things to do then spend hundreds of hours without a single conversation going anywhere. Online dating is a useless black hole.

Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a... by nunez on Friday June 11, 2021 @12:44PM (#27475577)
Bespoke messages based on the profile you're reading is always a winning strategy. My response rate went way up when I started doing this. The trick is to make a message that's curated enough to tell the person that you've read their profile while being short enough to not require a lot of effort to read (because their inbox is flooded)
Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a... by nunez on Friday June 11, 2021 @04:41PM (#27478200)
Another thing I did that helped was hide the photos of people I was looking at while browsing.

Towards the end of my time on OkCupid (where I met my wife!), I wanted to only compose five messages per day. I did this to reduce my time on the platform. (Online dating services are masters of dark patterns and addicting behaviors.) However, even though those messages were short, since they were bespoke to the profiles I was looking at, those messages took time to write.

I found myself in this predicament where I burned too much time looking at profiles of attractive women with bland (to me) profiles. So, I thought "what if I hid the photos and focused on profiles I thought were interesting?"

Three things happened when I did that:

1. Writing short, but targeted, messages became a LOT easier because I was focusing on connecting with people I probably wanted to spend more time with,

2. Since I never "saw" who I was messaging when I wrote those messages, me never getting a response from them hurt way less (since I never met them to begin with!), and

3. When I un-hid the photos of the women who responded to me, _they were still attractive!_ As it happens, I learned that I'm attracted to smart, pretty women with personalities.

I suppose this won't work for people who want to do the nasty with as many hot people as they can find. There were, like men, smart, attractive women who didn't know how to craft an online dating profile and got filtered out from this approach.

What I do know is that my response and date rate went WAY up after hiding photos and responding to interesting profiles, and my mental health towards online dating improved significantly.

Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a... by ms1 on Friday June 11, 2021 @06:39PM (#27479377)
This strategy won't work anymore, because old OKCupid style "long form" profiles are gone. Modern dating profiles have the equivalent of a twitter bio worth of stuff on them now.
Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a... by bittercynic on Friday June 11, 2021 @05:00PM (#27478423)
I'd wager a big part of the reason for the increased success was that you were messaging people who you were genuinely interested in, and the interest came across in your messages.
Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a... by lumost on Friday June 11, 2021 @11:49AM (#27474891)
This is why tinder was created, having both parties express some level of interest eliminates the need and most of the benefits of mass spamming. Granted one party could spam likes, but ranking algorithms probably take into account this behavior.
Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a... by lozaning on Friday June 11, 2021 @05:08PM (#27478515)
Tinder uses an ELO ranking system.