News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Privacy Analysis of FLoC by leipert on Thursday June 10, 2021 @04:30PM (#27465380)
Interesting. I just dislike ads altogether. Especially Instagram feels very manipulative. So far nothing we have bought based on Instagram or Facebook ads has been useful in the long run.

Personally I prefer to either have a need for something (I want to solve problem X) and do some research based off of that. Or I share an experience with a friend where they make a recommendation.

Funniest Facebook ad by the way: I work for <employer> and my partner gets ads for <products of employer> on Facebook.

Re:Privacy Analysis of FLoC by jedberg on Thursday June 10, 2021 @04:40PM (#27465501)
I dislike ads too. I'd rather just pay to use the sites. But I also understand not everyone can afford that. The ads are there for them.

So examples of things that I've bought from Instagram ads: The most recent Pride lego set. I would have never known it existed, but I'm glad I know now, because I want to give my kids something fun to build that sparks a conversation about Pride and what it means and why it's important.

The comma2 (autopilot for my Honda van). I knew OpenPilot existed, but until I saw that ad, I didn't know there was a product I could buy with it already installed. I liked the idea but didn't have time to get it all set up on my own. The existence of a commercial product vastly improved my life. I've already used it for over 1000 miles of self driving in just a couple weeks. It's a night and day difference when driving. I suppose I would have eventually heard about the product, but I'm glad I heard about it when I did.

Re:Privacy Analysis of FLoC by neolog on Thursday June 10, 2021 @05:47PM (#27466241)
Are there many people who can't afford to pay for a pageview but can afford the product being advertised on that page?
Re:Privacy Analysis of FLoC by jedberg on Thursday June 10, 2021 @05:49PM (#27466263)
No, but that's the whole point of ads. They're like a progressive tax system. Also some ads are awareness campaigns. Like you see a bunch of ads for Coke and the subconsciously when you want a soda you grab a Coke.
Re:Privacy Analysis of FLoC by fomine3 on Thursday June 10, 2021 @09:33PM (#27468346)
Of course exist. It is often said that some people who often buy $5 coffee don't sign up $10 web subscription or app. Also we can't sign up all paid subscription. I wish latter is solved by micro payment or combined subscription .
Re:Privacy Analysis of FLoC by johnfernow on Thursday June 10, 2021 @07:46PM (#27467549)
Thank you for mentioning the comma2. I also knew about OpenPilot but didn't realize there was a commercial product where most things are ready to go. I checked it out and am thinking about getting one now.
Re:Privacy Analysis of FLoC by wearywanderer on Thursday June 10, 2021 @05:16PM (#27465970)
Advertising is linked to depression, body dysmorphic disorders like anorexia, and numerous other adverse mental conditions. The advertising industry has a whole lot of blood on their hands. This is an industry that doesn't think twice about exploiting people's feelings of vulnerability or isolation to help sell products. The more vulnerable the demographic, the more abusive the advertising industry gets. Just look at the shit they subject teenagers to; almost all the advertising to teenagers is focused on how buying [product] will make the teenager like the popular and attractive models being used to shill the product.
Re:Privacy Analysis of FLoC by JW_00000 on Friday June 11, 2021 @11:06AM (#27474384)
Do you have a source (or more than one :) ) for that first statement? I believe it intuitively but would like to know if it's actually true.
Re:Privacy Analysis of FLoC by mavhc on Thursday June 10, 2021 @06:19PM (#27466550)
On the plus side it gives free information to billions of people, now everyone can have free gps maps, email, websites
Re:Privacy Analysis of FLoC by CrazedGeek on Thursday June 10, 2021 @06:45PM (#27466873)
It’s not free if you’re paying with your health.
Re:Privacy Analysis of FLoC by mavhc on Friday June 11, 2021 @10:56AM (#27474247)
How is your health affected?
Re:Privacy Analysis of FLoC by Nicksil on Friday June 11, 2021 @08:41AM (#27472499)
>On the plus side it gives free information to billions of people, now everyone can have free gps maps, email, websites

We've had that all along; for free. Nothing in this list is thanks to advertising.

Re:Privacy Analysis of FLoC by mavhc on Friday June 11, 2021 @10:55AM (#27474239)
Really? I remember people buying Satnavs and maps, and paying for email and hosting
Re:Privacy Analysis of FLoC by ksec on Friday June 11, 2021 @12:04AM (#27469166)
I like Good Ads. Non Invasive, Non Repetitive, Good / High Quality / Personalised ad. And preferably not slowing down the site.

Ads are also like news in a sense. And News is the most addictive form of media. You find new product, services, or announcement from Ads.

The problem is the quality of Digital / Online ads are generally quite low.

Re:Privacy Analysis of FLoC by thiht on Friday June 11, 2021 @03:24AM (#27470300)
> So far nothing we have bought based on Instagram or Facebook ads has been useful in the long run.

Why do you buy things you don't need just because you see an ad?

Re:Privacy Analysis of FLoC by leipert on Friday June 11, 2021 @05:05AM (#27470903)
Well the ad has had it’s effect.

Hey this seems like an interesting appliance, tech gadget, item for camping or toy for a child. And then after some use and the novelty wore off it isn’t really that useful anymore.