Re:Replit used legal threats to kill my open-source project
by Aeolun on Monday June 07, 2021 @11:47PM
(#27430456)
In a working justice system the judge takes one look at all that and dismisses the case, then fines them for a frivolous waste of the court’s time.
Re:Replit used legal threats to kill my open-source project
by smnrchrds on Tuesday June 08, 2021 @12:15AM
(#27430581)
Well, then I guess US and Canada's justice systems are non-working. Because that's not what will happen in practice. Also, there is a lot of legal work that needs to get done even before getting in front of a judge, and those can cost 100 ks on their own.
Re:Replit used legal threats to kill my open-source project
by tluyben2 on Tuesday June 08, 2021 @02:52AM
(#27431370)
As far as I read the news and if it is true, then indeed I believe the US system is quite broken. Seems geared towards screwing over and bullying the poor.
Re:Replit used legal threats to kill my open-source project
by eecc on Tuesday June 08, 2021 @02:25AM
(#27431240)
Right, the “cat our of the bag” argument. Also similar to the ones used in the Napster, Torrent, eMule file-sharing persecutions whereby any forgettable film shared would instantly tally as a lost sale for each-and-every participant to the platform. :/
I mean, it's not like Anthony Levandowski put millions of self-driving cars in the streets and took business away from Waymo's self-driving cars. Just by copying Google's intellectual property, not even publishing it for the whole world to see, he committed an offence that cost 18 months in prison and more than 100 million dollars in fines.
Of course, this lawsuit may not have gotten that far, as it seems quite baseless. But it would have taken years of mental turmoil and hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees for that to be established. And that is if the threat of the unfavourable outcome did not cause another tragedy like Aaron Swartz's.