News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Django Unicorn – A full-stack framework for Django by readonthegoapp on Saturday June 05, 2021 @08:26AM (#27404335)
This shit looks cool

As do some or many of the other competing technologies

I've been struggling to pick a stack that is super gd simple

But still let me do some SPA stuff for certain parts of the app

I might never actually write a line of code myself, but even so I want to easily be able to tell what my contractor is doing

And fix if necessary

Guide architecture

Maybe choose the initial stack in the first place

I'm overwhelmed at this point as to which stack I can use that will suck the least

Prob the biggest issue I have is just that '80%' number I often see thrown around with these new front end non-js js frameworks

That is, this will probably be able to handle about 80% of your use cases

Tf?

Noooooo

100%, please

At least, 100% of all up-to-medium-or-high complexity use cases

Not that I'm planning on rocket science

The question I want answered for any new tool like this is

Can it do basic UI interactivity like Duolingo?

Ok, then I'm in

Other than that

How to really compare this unicorn for django with livewire for laravel, inertia and or vue for everything, nuxt (which looks interesting), etc.

And my preferred contractor prefers rails, gd.

Re:Django Unicorn – A full-stack framework for Django by replwoacause on Saturday June 05, 2021 @11:11AM (#27405697)
I found this post to be almost unintelligible.
Re:Django Unicorn – A full-stack framework for Django by _bhlv on Saturday June 05, 2021 @04:19PM (#27408167)
You're not alone. I read it twice. Still don't get it. I think he's using Google Translate or something