>Perhaps but i don't feel they deserve the benefit of the doubt.

14 years is a long time really, there are people who get the benefit of a doubt for murder after 14 years.

> there are people who get the benefit of a doubt for murder after 14 years

They tend not to get put in charge of anti-murder departments, though, like this person being made Head Of Diversity.

well probably they tend not to get that because once you've done time in the U.S you're screwed whether it was for stealing a candy bar, dealing drugs, or murder.

On the other hand the exception to that rule would be - I've known guys who were drug addicts, caught, go through rehabs, and become counselors and psychologists in the judicial system. Which is pretty close to the scenario under discussion.

on edit - ok only know two guys who did that, but they exist.

But never police or doctors who can prescribe drugs.

You'll be surprised to know how many doctors and police officers around the World made use of drugs, went through rehab and still do a decent job...

well sure, in America.

I wouldn't touch a murderer with a 10 foot pole.

How about a veteran?

How do you know if the veteran you’re thanking on Memorial Day did not commit murder, rape, or other war crimes?

Or is it OK if done in uniform, with 21st Century weapons, or following orders?

Take a look at the Fishmongers Hall heroes. The narwhal tusk was only a 5 foot pole, but the convicted killers put themselves in harms way to protect the public.

I don't think you, or anyone else, should have any say in that, quite frankly. Let their current words and behavior speak for itself.

Which crimes do you feel are beyond rehabilitation? I can only think of one area of crime where the majority of people would agree without hesitation.

There exist former KKK members. Former neonazis. Former Trump supporters.

People learn.

https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/544861933/how-one-man-convinc...

Maybe this person didn’t, and it is not appropriate to hold the head of diversity title.

But if they’re doing everything right, and do represent diverse workforce, then is “not having had anti-Semitic views 14 years ago” a job requirement?

What do the Jewish/POC colleagues have to say about the quality of their workplace?

>What do the Jewish/POC colleagues have to say about the quality of their workplace?

I definitely wouldn't want to work at Google with this guy in management. Sorry, but I'm just not interested in having my "insatiable appetite for war" touted as an asset to a diverse, equitable, and inclusive workplace.