Windmills and solar panels are not just cheaper, they're also easier to build while nuclear power plant construction (at least in Europe) seemed to take forever and got more and more expensive in the process.
That probably has at least something to do with why we aren't seeing much new construction in countries with freer economies. I would guess that another significant factor is, for regions like North America and western Europe that already have a substantial investment in nuclear, it perhaps makes more sense to do what they're already doing: upgrading their existing plants rather than building new ones.
Although wind & solar is not that popular here either. I don't know what we will do.
i know some czechs making a daily commute over the border in order to work installing solar panels (in germany).
so there's that
In the end it doesn't matter where the panels are installed, as electricity is distributed throughout Europe, I guess?
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/georgemonbiot/2011/a...
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/sep/15/nuclea...
In any case, I think nuclear is pretty much dead. It's just cheaper to spam windmills and solar panels. I think it will stay there for a while (in some countries, that have the history and the expertise), but it will not gain significantly in the future.