Re:Don't take on China alone, says ex-Australia PM Kevin Rudd
by simonh on Sunday May 30, 2021 @10:45AM
(#27333596)
Indeed, the blatant subtext of whataboutist arguments is that these things are ok, they're fine, they're normal and justifiable or should be, and here's a reason why.
Re:Don't take on China alone, says ex-Australia PM Kevin Rudd
by emptysongglass on Sunday May 30, 2021 @10:43AM
(#27333581)
How would you like me to respond? I have not declared any argument whataboutism. I am only interested in sources from governments which guarantees and exercises a free press.
You cannot write a piece of paper in bad faith and declare it legitimate if you are the only source of legitimacy.
Re:Don't take on China alone, says ex-Australia PM Kevin Rudd
by FooBarWidget on Sunday May 30, 2021 @10:49AM
(#27333636)
You could focus on what China actually accused the US of, and whether that accusation has a point, rather than on the fact that the accusation came from China. Where it comes from doesn't matter: only the content matters.
If we accept that, then the reverse should also apply: Misconduct by China doesn't make China's criticism against the US invalid.