Re:Analysis of blood markers predicts human lifespan limit
by kaikai on Wednesday May 26, 2021 @10:32AM
(#27290942)
A different calendar doesn’t necessitate mean a different year length. We still measure a year as a complete solar cycle, and that hasn’t changed.
Re:Analysis of blood markers predicts human lifespan limit
by vmception on Wednesday May 26, 2021 @11:03AM
(#27291421)
There are many nuances in how a year is and was determined
Re:Analysis of blood markers predicts human lifespan limit
by _ZeD_ on Wednesday May 26, 2021 @11:54AM
(#27292137)
"nuances" as in ... seconds? minutes? days?
Re:Analysis of blood markers predicts human lifespan limit
by vmception on Wednesday May 26, 2021 @01:17PM
(#27293322)
The Roman calendar was just a lunar month times ten until being fixed to a solar year around like 500 BC
I don't know if there are retroactive fixes to what years were which and if that coincides with the Bible or universal acceptance of their solar calendar
Let me know
Re:Analysis of blood markers predicts human lifespan limit
by rootusrootus on Wednesday May 26, 2021 @01:31PM
(#27293521)
> Roman calendar was just a lunar month times ten
Plus the winter, which was unassigned until it eventually became January and February. I don't see anything about it counting the entire year as anything other than a solar year.
2000 years ago but even the King James Version wouldn’t have been using a gregorian calendar yet
And usually when talking about the Bible there has some greek or hebrew translation liberty
Before we all decide it’s open to interpretation anyway
Well I had your whole conversation for you, let me know