Take chess grandmasters, for a counterexample. Their memory of chess positions and speed of processing them is incredible. Here's an example of puzzle rush, where the puzzles get progressively harder: https://youtu.be/B2ywPhNygM8?t=370
Someone wanna slap that game together and share the link? It would be fun to self test what the chimp was doing. Still though, really amazing to see how similar we are to them.
In medium mode, the numbers are hidden only after you click on 1. In hard mode, the numbers are flashed for 210ms. I couldn't succeed with that one, not even close.
The game is very rough and not mobile-friendly though, sorry. I know nothing about front-end development and my interest quickly waned.
If you think about it, there's nothing especially mysterious about good memory per se if we view it as something like writing things down or a recording. You have to put effort into destroying the memory. Degradation is comparatively slow. So to judge how good (or conversely, bad) memory is, you have to determine what the goal is and the "architecture" implementing it. Recalling recent images that are destroyed shortly after being recorded vs. a mind map of conceptual relations, for example.
We are more on collaborating and thus evolved language.
Watched a video of a Japanese researcher showing a video picture of symbols to a chimp which then faded away within a few seconds.
I then got a food treat if it could recall the pattern on the touch screen - on the more difficult levels it had to also remember the sequence of the patterns as well.
Chimps always won against a human.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKvX9PPmI-Q