Re:Texas to allow unlicensed carrying of handguns
by calvinmorrison on Tuesday May 25, 2021 @10:46AM
(#27277483)
> The constitutional amendment is about a “well-regulated militia”. The purpose was common defense against military invasion, not citizens having intramural shoot-outs.
DC vs Heller disagrees
Re:Texas to allow unlicensed carrying of handguns
by jimbilly22 on Tuesday May 25, 2021 @12:48PM
(#27279164)
Nope. This is simply factually incorrect.
Take the Pennsylvania constitution, written also in 1776 (by many of the same authors, as we know, as the federal constitution). They also have a "2a" clause. Below:
"That the people have a right to bear arms for the defense of themselves and the state"
There is simply no other way to interpret it -- the 2a was meant as an individual right to own common-use firearms.
Anyone who says otherwise, and is educated on the matter, is lying.
The constitutional amendment is about a “well-regulated militia”. The purpose was common defense against military invasion, not citizens having intramural shoot-outs.