News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:2022 Ford F-150 Lightning by TchoBeer on Friday May 21, 2021 @05:44PM (#27240348)
>So sure, it's good to make easy adjustments if they lead to big reductions in deaths, but it's not reasonable to care a ton about seriousness restricting the form factor yet think cars are fine in general.

unless the form factor has some very significant upside that I'm not seeing, preventing deaths should be prioritized over people's aesthetic preferences.

>It's clear consumers in the US value the large truck format and are willing to pay for it.

no, it's clear that consumers in the US don't value the lives of pedestrians, and therefore we cannot trust the free market to determine what types of things get made.

Re:2022 Ford F-150 Lightning by jessriedel on Friday May 21, 2021 @09:29PM (#27242317)
> unless the form factor has some very significant upside that I'm not seeing, preventing deaths should be prioritized over people's aesthetic preferences.

Nope. "Deaths should always be prioritized over aesthetics" is a clearly bad rule because it is innumerate. You must always trade off how many deaths for the preferences of how many people. Otherwise all design of everything is dictated solely by safety.

> no, it's clear that consumers in the US don't value the lives of pedestrians, and therefore we cannot trust the free market to determine what types of things get made.

No, you need to read about externalities and Pigovian taxes. The entire point of the proposed tax is that it does not require the car buyer to care about pedestrians whatsoever.

Re:2022 Ford F-150 Lightning by SECProto on Friday May 21, 2021 @11:00PM (#27242957)
Vehicle drivers decide what vehicles they buy, but pedestrians do not. The Regulations (or lack thereof) incentivize vehicles that kill more pedestrians
Re:2022 Ford F-150 Lightning by sgjohnson on Friday May 21, 2021 @05:54PM (#27240454)
Surely you can’t be serious