Re:Who Goes Nazi? (1941)
by michaelbuddy on Wednesday May 19, 2021 @04:48AM
(#27206075)
There's no need to provide "alternative" theories to clumsy pointless articles. That kind of clutter just needs to be pointed out for its foolishness and ignored, nothing more.
Re:Who Goes Nazi? (1941)
by SideburnsOfDoom on Wednesday May 19, 2021 @04:59AM
(#27206131)
I'm interested in alternative theories of this kind of social movement and who signs up for it, article or not. Or rather, I would be interested in alternative theories, if I thought that the article was fundamentally wrong rather than just a bit dated in the presentation; understandably so as it was written 80 years ago.
Any thoughts? Or should we say that it's just random who signs up?
> Their race, color, creed, or social condition is not the criterion (to go Nazi). It is something in them.
Grandparent comment:
> Author tries to highlight that there are certain types of people that would get attracted.
If you disagree with that, what do you suggest as an alternative explanation?