News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Who Goes Nazi? (1941) by refurb on Wednesday May 19, 2021 @03:41AM (#27205704)
You just proved their point. Not much has changed in 70 years - still plenty of self-appointed “educated elite” who are more than happy to explain why other people are wrong yet never turn that same filter on themselves. Their bubble and isolation (“he had a classical education”) has left them so out of touch with the life of the common man that they can’t fathom any explanation for their beliefs but character weakness and ignorance. All while ignoring their own blind spots.
Re:Who Goes Nazi? (1941) by SideburnsOfDoom on Wednesday May 19, 2021 @04:32AM (#27205980)
Article:

> Their race, color, creed, or social condition is not the criterion (to go Nazi). It is something in them.

Grandparent comment:

> Author tries to highlight that there are certain types of people that would get attracted.

If you disagree with that, what do you suggest as an alternative explanation?

Re:Who Goes Nazi? (1941) by michaelbuddy on Wednesday May 19, 2021 @04:48AM (#27206075)
There's no need to provide "alternative" theories to clumsy pointless articles. That kind of clutter just needs to be pointed out for its foolishness and ignored, nothing more.
Re:Who Goes Nazi? (1941) by SideburnsOfDoom on Wednesday May 19, 2021 @04:59AM (#27206131)
I'm interested in alternative theories of this kind of social movement and who signs up for it, article or not. Or rather, I would be interested in alternative theories, if I thought that the article was fundamentally wrong rather than just a bit dated in the presentation; understandably so as it was written 80 years ago.

Any thoughts? Or should we say that it's just random who signs up?