News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Missing line in a smart contract leads to $10M hack. Parent comment

Re:Missing line in a smart contract leads to $10M hack by dools on Tuesday May 18, 2021 @10:04PM (#27203746)
Didn't the US government just drain the crypto accounts of some online hacker collective that ransomwared that petrol pipeline?

Also the verb is "garnisheed". They're not putting parsely on it :)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Missing line in a smart contract leads to $10M hack by dragonwriter on Tuesday May 18, 2021 @10:07PM (#27203755)
> Also the verb is "garnisheed".

No, its “garnish”, past-tense “garnished”.

> They're not putting parsely on it :)

No, but its the exact same verb, just a different sense.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Missing line in a smart contract leads to $10M hack by dools on Thursday May 20, 2021 @03:15AM (#27218306)
No it's not, the word is garnishee
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Missing line in a smart contract leads to $10M hack by dragonwriter on Thursday May 20, 2021 @03:33AM (#27218422)
“garnishee” is the noun for the person subject to the garnishment (that is, the person owing/controlling money to/of the debtor whose held funds or payments are redirected from the debtor to the creditor); the verb for imposing the garnishment is “garnish”, and in the past tense “garnished” not “garnisheed”.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/garnishee

[ Parent | on HN ]