News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ethereum will use around 99.95% less energy post merge by 3np on Tuesday May 18, 2021 @06:27PM (#27202093)
...yet, all these are fairly new. Give it another 2-5 years for implementations and integrations.

Also, it’s already used in defi, if you count that as “real world”. Reminds me of when anything on the internet wasnt “real”.

Re:Ethereum will use around 99.95% less energy post merge by Daishiman on Tuesday May 18, 2021 @06:41PM (#27202211)
Sorry but I've been following the last decade of the crypto world. In a decade I have not seen a single "defi" product sticking around because there just doesn't seem to be real demand for these products.

Considering how many spaces in new startups developed massive traction in that span of time (social networks, other forms of digital payments and banking, online marketplaces) the fact that there are no star products in such a span of time gives me little consideration.

Re:Ethereum will use around 99.95% less energy post merge by suikadayo on Tuesday May 18, 2021 @08:05PM (#27202956)
Wait what? DeFi pretty much started booming from last summer.. it hasn't existed for a decade. Do you not know Uniswap? It's existed since around 2017. Sushiswap? even Pancakeswap?

There's $80 billion locked in DeFi right now. https://defipulse.com/

Uniswap has more transaction fees than the Bitcoin network https://cryptofees.info/history/2021-05-16

Institutions are even starting to get in https://twitter.com/stanikulechov/status/1394390461968633859

Re:Ethereum will use around 99.95% less energy post merge by jude- on Tuesday May 18, 2021 @08:58PM (#27203342)
I call bs. There is not $80 billion USD locked in defi -- the world has not taken $80 billion USD, bought crypto with it, and put the crypto into defi code. Like, where are the receipts?

What has happened is defi tokens have appreciated through speculation. Sites like defi pulse erroneously represent the wealth locked into defi contracts as token_price * tokens_locked, which is trivial to manipulate for shallow-market tokens. Like, I can spin up a token with 1 billion units, buy one token for $1, and put the remaining tokens into a defi contract. Voila -- defi pulse reports $81 billion locked.

EDIT: downvotes aren't receipts, and downvoting doesn't change the accounting discrepancy.

Re:Ethereum will use around 99.95% less energy post merge by Daishiman on Tuesday May 18, 2021 @09:10PM (#27203419)
An 80 billion market cap in Ponzi scheme products with no star companies that testify the usage of said products sounds like a scam.
Re:Ethereum will use around 99.95% less energy post merge by rhlsthrm on Tuesday May 18, 2021 @11:21PM (#27204161)
Aave, Compound are both not Ponzi schemes and allow you to lock things like USDC and ETH (also not Ponzi schemes) for others to borrow, and earn interest. It's automated lending, I don't understand how people are not excited about this.
Re:Ethereum will use around 99.95% less energy post merge by kobasa on Wednesday May 19, 2021 @05:27AM (#27206299)
No demand for DeFi? Are you serious? Total value in DeFi has gone from sub $1b to over $70b in the last year.
Re:Ethereum will use around 99.95% less energy post merge by CameronNemo on Tuesday May 18, 2021 @08:06PM (#27202966)
>Give it another 2-5 years for implementations and integrations.

This is what I heard when Lightning went live.

Re:Ethereum will use around 99.95% less energy post merge by suikadayo on Tuesday May 18, 2021 @08:18PM (#27203053)
Lightning usability is horrible and requires 2 parties to be online at the same time, whereas with Ethereum scaling solutions, you can use your regular metamask wallet to deposit, and you're on L2.
Re:Ethereum will use around 99.95% less energy post merge by Daishiman on Tuesday May 18, 2021 @09:55PM (#27203683)
And very likely just like Lighting we'll hear similar excuses as to why it doesn't work.