Such irony in CCP using licensing to protect their IP
and what's the "correct-conception"?[1]
I'm curious because I get what parent means in terms of intellectual property issues in China but I don't get what do you mean from your comment, especially the fact that you include "other party states" - is it some sort of general rule that you're hinting at?
[1] funny, I just realised that there is no antonym of "misconception"
At least in science education, misconceptions are so vastly more common than correct conceptions, that it makes sense there's a compact negative form but not a positive one. /s
china, the ethnicity, is indeed thousands years old. CCP, however, is barely over 70 yrs old.
But the CCP has been controlling mainland China for a little bit over 70 years, indeed.
At the end of the day they may obfuscate coordinates and blur maps, but the truth will eventually come out.
Can't imagine why anyone would want that to happen.....
The open-sourced implementation one may find on the internet are probably thru sth like curve fitting by sampling many data points. It may have good enough approximations but may not work one day if the gov agency decides to change the algorithm. Changing algorithm is a backward compatibility hell but not a big problem for the industry actually, because most Map apps are owned by big corp which has resource and motivation to comply.