Re:Samsung boosts non-memory chip investment to $151B
by will4274 on Sunday May 16, 2021 @01:31PM
(#27175355)
> Fracking is immensely damaging to the ecosystem.
Not really. Energy is a dirty business, and also one filled with politics and propoganda. Fracking, much like nuclear, was targeted mostly for political, not technical reasons. It's damaging, but less so than coal and not all that much more than vanilla drilling and pipelines in general.
Re:Samsung boosts non-memory chip investment to $151B
by baybal2 on Sunday May 16, 2021 @01:56PM
(#27175594)
Worth to mention that US reserves are enormous even without fracking. Tons of oil, and gas everywhere.
Re:Samsung boosts non-memory chip investment to $151B
by mensetmanusman on Sunday May 16, 2021 @09:58AM
(#27173751)
It’s not as damaging as coal, which is fortunate for the clean energy transition.
Solar is now the cheapest assuming we get grid scale storage(or, more likely, store excess solar as hydrogen fuel).
Re:Samsung boosts non-memory chip investment to $151B
by lazide on Sunday May 16, 2021 @05:10PM
(#27177034)
Most solar is now produced in China, at 71%+ as of 2019 (and only grown since then I imagine). If we’re talking national security, that is a concern too.
Re:Samsung boosts non-memory chip investment to $151B
by mensetmanusman on Monday May 17, 2021 @12:39PM
(#27185384)
These panels might last 30 years, which is great! Also gives us time to consider strategies…
Additionally, the US won't ever need to touch these again if it manages to reduce its reliance on fossil fuels.