Imagine gradually choking as you wait for a friend to open their front door - oops, you forgot their air doesn't know you're allowed to use Oxygen, hope they get here in time to explicitly authorise you to breathe...
Because of the Network Effect the grand total number of Networks you care about will always be... one. So, it doesn't make sense to have a dozen fiercely independent WiFi networks in the same physical volume all of which are, in fact, just offering access to the same network (the Internet) but with separate credentials needed for each.
There have been very slow steps on the obvious way forward here. If you've been a student somewhere civilized in the last couple of decades you might have seen EduRoam. Under EduROAM your credentials from say, the University of Florida, or Stanford work at MIT and NYU, but also in Oxford, and in Tokyo. No more need to maintain separate "guest" networks so that the visiting lecturer's laptop works. But most of us, most of the time, are using dozens of little pointless fiefdoms.
Also putting all your big-tech eggs in one basket isn't a great direction for the Internet.
OTOH the technology can move from private radios to the model of cellular networks, where you don't care which tower you connect to, and the security / authorization lives at a different level.
But, yes DVD players come with license agreements, EULAs.
Please tell me you're joking.
Other places I'm not sure, but I'd guess you'll get one anyway.
Will they hold up in court? Who knows. But look and you're likely to find one they'll at least pretend applies to you.
(And to be clear, yes I agree that this is _ridiculous_)
If you're feeling especially crafty, open the back of your TV and disconnect the wifi/bluetooth board. It's a discrete board in all of my TVs of different brands. I assume they build them this way so they can use the same network board design/production for years and just upgrade the main logic board in newer models.
Even if it isn't/hasn't happened, there's nothing to stop someone like Samsung sticking cellular modems in their TVs to work around you doing this.
If we think about it like Air-Tags too, popular enough product, it'll just connect to one of your neighbour's TV's which _is_ online.
I remember years ago, Vodafone gave me a "free" femtocell because signal in my home was poor. They neglected to mention the fact it broadcast a public cellular signal which allowed other Vodafone customers to use _my_ internet bandwidth.
True. Although, if they put that SIM card on the bluetooth/wifi network board that I'm disconnecting then I'll be ok.
I would be surprised if they used cellular technology for this though (from a cost perspective). I'd expect a lorawan/helium like implementation.
Amazon has a solution to this. If your tv is within wifi range of an amazon device, your TV will be able to connect to a network. It might even be your neighbors device.
e.g. the Samsung QB65R on Amazon
So yeah it's like $100-200 more expensive, but hardly seems.. unapproachable?
Even radiuz was probably better.
https://wifinetnews.com/archives/2004/06/radiuz_combines_wpa...
Scary times.