News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:People who live past 105 years old have genes that stop D... by grishka on Saturday May 08, 2021 @06:08PM (#27091205)
This one is easy. First of all, evolution only cares about the species as a whole, so the survival of an individual, especially after they've produced their offspring, doesn't matter much. Second, in the wild, animals will be killed by predators much more quickly than they'd die of old age, so all the mutations that only manifest negatively in older age have never had a chance to be selected against.

Besides, the whole premise of evolution is that older generations die.

(disclaimer: I'm a software developer, not a biologist, but I'm fascinated by biology)

Re:People who live past 105 years old have genes that stop D... by I-M-S on Saturday May 08, 2021 @06:42PM (#27091460)
You got it in reverse: evolution only "cares" about the individual

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Red_Queen:_Sex_and_the_Evo...

Re:People who live past 105 years old have genes that stop D... by robwwilliams on Saturday May 08, 2021 @08:52PM (#27092177)
Lol. I usually read HN to follow tech trends. This thread in hilariously uninformed. It is as shaky as me writing a critique of database engines would be.

On this specific subthread: yes the individual is the level of selection (mainly) but Dawkins has renewed interest in the sequence variant as the ultimate unit of selection. We are protoplasmic bags of gene variants, some of which make it to the next generations.