News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New x86 micro-op vulnerability breaks all known Spectre d... by tyingq on Friday April 30, 2021 @07:38PM (#27001045)
Separate micro-op cache per core, and no hyperthreading, so ARM would seem better equipped to defend against this.
Re:New x86 micro-op vulnerability breaks all known Spectre d... by spacemanmatt on Saturday May 01, 2021 @07:04AM (#27005263)
Good to know. This new era of aggressive hardware flaw exploitation has me motivated to leverage my mobility and flexibility to evade. I don't think I have a better strategy.
Re:New x86 micro-op vulnerability breaks all known Spectre d... by grishka on Saturday May 01, 2021 @09:00AM (#27005952)
So ARM CPUs do have microcode after all?
Re:New x86 micro-op vulnerability breaks all known Spectre d... by mhh__ on Saturday May 01, 2021 @09:57AM (#27006347)
Microcode != Using micro-ops.

Microcode has been around for half a century at least, much longer than micro-ops.

Re:New x86 micro-op vulnerability breaks all known Spectre d... by grishka on Saturday May 01, 2021 @12:16PM (#27007467)
Uh. I thought that micro-ops were literally microcode instructions/operations?
Re:New x86 micro-op vulnerability breaks all known Spectre d... by mhh__ on Saturday May 01, 2021 @12:40PM (#27007674)
In a modern processor they are however microcode as a general term is a catch-all term which basically means non-trivial configuration logic stored in somewhere not meant to be touched by people other than the vendor. I think IBM have millicode.
Re:New x86 micro-op vulnerability breaks all known Spectre d... by orge on Sunday May 02, 2021 @08:55PM (#27020522)
nanocode?