Re:Opera adds native support for blockchain domain names
by 6510 on Thursday April 29, 2021 @11:06PM
(#26989491)
The killer feature could be a file type named after the kinds of websites people make. Say .blog or .forum or .store or .social perhaps even .aggregator or .hn (lol) each would work like a straight jacket or like a website on a platform (.blog like blogger, .store like shopify etc) it could be distributed and insanely fast. Every other link just opens in the normal browser.
Re:Opera adds native support for blockchain domain names
by fiddlerwoaroof on Thursday April 29, 2021 @11:14PM
(#26989524)
It's interesting to think about this sort of thing: interactive forms generated from OpenAPI specs? Some way to plug-in handlers for specific mime-types? etc.
Re:Opera adds native support for blockchain domain names
by easton on Thursday April 29, 2021 @11:31PM
(#26989595)
This is the dream, honestly. Dynamic form creation from specs. PowerShell has something like it (for a function it will create you a ugly form that you can render), but if you could deliver a OpenAPI spec and have Bootstrap (or whatever) UI on the frontend automatically generated.
Re:Opera adds native support for blockchain domain names
by kelnos on Friday April 30, 2021 @02:56AM
(#26990551)
The Swagger UI[0] is more a documentation/exploration tool for APIs, but it shows enough of what you can do that I don't think it'd be all that difficult to generate something that you'd want to put on your own website.
Re:Opera adds native support for blockchain domain names
by girvo on Friday April 30, 2021 @12:12AM
(#26989762)
This is not quite what you mean, but I've used it before to decent success:
Re:Opera adds native support for blockchain domain names
by lmz on Thursday April 29, 2021 @11:21PM
(#26989554)
Surely IE6 already had a "reasonable subset" and devs hated it for holding back progress...
Re:Opera adds native support for blockchain domain names
by fiddlerwoaroof on Thursday April 29, 2021 @11:25PM
(#26989571)
The main reason I disliked it was it wasn't standards compliant for the parts it did implement: you couldn't write code to-spec and expect it to work on both IE6 and Firefox, without testing each browser separately.
Or just fork webkit/blink and aggressively refactor.